The NYT has published an article criticizing Robert Kennedy and parroting the same nonsense about no effects of wireless radiation, calling it "weak" radiation.

Radiation Fears Bring MAHA and MAGA Movements into Conflict

Please respond today as the comments may close soon. 

Here was Odette's response:

The WHO’s International EMF Project Review of April 2025 of animal studies found reliable evidence that RF radiation increases the risk of cancer. That seems to be the future study referred to in the NYT hyperlinked article about the WHO. This reinforces the 2018 findings of cancer from the FDA’s National Toxicology Program for 2G and 3G cell phones and the Ramazzini Institute in Italy for cell towers.  It would seem a mischaracterization, then, to call this cancer-associated nonionizing radiation as “weak.”  The FCC has been under a court remand order from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals since 2021 to address its outdated 1996 wireless exposure limits and the 11,000 pages of scientific, peer-reviewed studies showing adverse biological effects within those limits.  Unfortunately, this is too late for the 4 children who contracted cancer (liver, kidney and brain) after a cell tower was put up on the grounds of their elementary school.  They ranged in age from 6 to 10 years old.  After the fourth child was diagnosed with cancer, the cell tower was removed.  The child with brain cancer died last year.